4 Comments

It is now commonly understood among many members of the 1619 community that the US Civil War was basically a slave rebellion.

Expand full comment

Can you point me to a specific example? Inquiring minds want to know!

Expand full comment

Much in this article lends itself to be taken out of context, and points to that understanding. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43525589?mag=did-black-rebellion-win-the-civil-war&seq=1

WEB Dubois famously characterized slaves in antebellum US as a proto-proletariat, chiefly among Black urban craftsmen. But it fell to others such as Stephen Hahn (196) and Stephanie McCurry (197) to say pretty explicitly the Civil War was a slave rebellion. Yes, they back into it with statements like this "Historians....have shied away from any description of the Civil War as a slave rebellion."

On 211, the author concludes it was Blacks themselves who transformed the US war aims from unity of the states to emancipation of the slaves. This seems like a striking overreach for the evidence he gives.

Just one article. It would take a Darnton to track down how this thinking migrates into the popular culture, where I've seen it many times. Will report on sightings.

Expand full comment

Sure. This has come up not as a formal assertion, but as window-dressing in a number of interviews, comments, and such. Kind of like the gayness of Hitler meme that actually got on major network news about 10 years ago. Will track it down.

And I promise not to take the easy way out, that is to call a news-maker with a leading question.

Expand full comment